ONBPP
Price
$25.05
Change
+$0.10 (+0.40%)
Updated
Jun 6, 11:43 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
WAL
Price
$74.33
Change
+$2.21 (+3.06%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.88B
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ONBPP vs WAL

Header iconONBPP vs WAL Comparison
Open Charts ONBPP vs WALBanner chart's image
Old National Ban
Price$25.05
Change+$0.10 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Western Alliance Ban
Price$74.33
Change+$2.21 (+3.06%)
Volume$10.84K
Capitalization6.88B
ONBPP vs WAL Comparison Chart
Loading...
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ONBPP vs. WAL commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONBPP is a StrongBuy and WAL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ONBPP: $24.95 vs. WAL: $72.12)
Brand notoriety: ONBPP and WAL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ONBPP: 20% vs. WAL: 44%
Market capitalization -- ONBPP: $0 vs. WAL: $6.88B
ONBPP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. WAL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ONBPP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWAL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ONBPP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WAL is a better buy in the long-term than ONBPP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WAL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WAL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ONBPP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.34% price change this week, while WAL (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

WAL is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.41% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ONBPP YTD gains are higher at: 4.555 vs. WAL (-12.879). ONBPP has more cash in the bank: 473M vs. WAL (289M). ONBPP has less debt than WAL: ONBPP (5.05B) vs WAL (8.12B). WAL has higher revenues than ONBPP: WAL (2.13B) vs ONBPP (1.84B).
ONBPPWALONBPP / WAL
CapitalizationN/A6.88B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.555-12.879-35%
P/E RatioN/A9.55-
Revenue1.84B2.13B86%
Total Cash473M289M164%
Total Debt5.05B8.12B62%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WAL: Fundamental Ratings
WAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
81
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64
SMR RATING
1..100
6
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
33
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHT7.990.01
+0.13%
Pioneer High Income Fund
BBEU67.690.06
+0.09%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF
PSCU54.350.04
+0.07%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Ult & Comnc Svc ETF
PLDR32.54-0.08
-0.23%
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
QQMG35.79-0.29
-0.80%
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF

ONBPP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONBPP has been loosely correlated with FHN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONBPP jumps, then FHN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONBPP
1D Price
Change %
ONBPP100%
+0.24%
FHN - ONBPP
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
WAL - ONBPP
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
RBB - ONBPP
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
CMA - ONBPP
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
ONBPO - ONBPP
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
More