FHN
Price
$23.65
Change
-$0.35 (-1.46%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.21B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ONBPP
Price
$24.85
Change
-$0.10 (-0.40%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FHN vs ONBPP

Header iconFHN vs ONBPP Comparison
Open Charts FHN vs ONBPPBanner chart's image
FHN vs ONBPP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHN vs. ONBPP commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHN is a Buy and ONBPP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FHN: $24.00 vs. ONBPP: $24.95)
Brand notoriety: FHN and ONBPP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHN: 92% vs. ONBPP: 18%
Market capitalization -- FHN: $11.21B vs. ONBPP: $0
FHN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.21B. ONBPP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileONBPP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FHN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ONBPP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHN is a better buy in the long-term than ONBPP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONBPP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FHN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ONBPP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHN is a better buy in the short-term than ONBPP.

Price Growth

FHN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.60% price change this week, while ONBPP (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

FHN is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.84% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ONBPP YTD gains are higher at: 3.682 vs. FHN (1.194). FHN has more cash in the bank: 912M vs. ONBPP (537M). FHN has less debt than ONBPP: FHN (3.29B) vs ONBPP (7.36B). FHN has higher revenues than ONBPP: FHN (3.37B) vs ONBPP (2.74B).
FHNONBPPFHN / ONBPP
Capitalization11.2BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.1943.68232%
P/E Ratio12.06N/A-
Revenue3.37B2.74B123%
Total Cash912M537M170%
Total Debt3.29B7.36B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHN: Fundamental Ratings
FHN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHNONBPP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
15%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FHN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ONBPP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTRX13.680.29
+2.17%
Matrix Service Company
ALG152.762.90
+1.94%
Alamo Group
FGNXP23.00-1.89
-7.59%
Fundamental Global Inc
SARO25.14-2.22
-8.11%
StandardAero Inc
AIOS14.44-1.44
-9.07%
AIOS Tech Inc.

FHN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHN has been closely correlated with HWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHN jumps, then HWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHN
1D Price
Change %
FHN100%
+1.61%
HWC - FHN
82%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
WTFC - FHN
82%
Closely correlated
+2.02%
FNB - FHN
81%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
KEY - FHN
81%
Closely correlated
+2.34%
ASB - FHN
81%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
More

ONBPP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONBPP has been loosely correlated with FHN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONBPP jumps, then FHN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONBPP
1D Price
Change %
ONBPP100%
+0.00%
FHN - ONBPP
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
WAL - ONBPP
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.30%
RBB - ONBPP
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
FULT - ONBPP
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
BKU - ONBPP
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
More