Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ONEO vs XMHQ
ONEO vs XMHQ Comparison
Open Charts ONEO vs XMHQ
SPDR® Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
Price$129.24
Change+$0.78 (+0.61%)
Volume$382
Net Assets96.35M
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Price$105.49
Change+$1.31 (+1.26%)
Volume$961
Net Assets5.23B
ONEO vs XMHQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ONEO vs. XMHQ commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONEO is a StrongBuy and XMHQ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XMHQ has more net assets: 5.23B vs. ONEO (96.3M). ONEO has a higher annual dividend yield than XMHQ: ONEO (9.935) vs XMHQ (7.687). ONEO was incepted earlier than XMHQ: ONEO (10 years) vs XMHQ (19 years). ONEO (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than XMHQ (0.25). XMHQ has a higher turnover ONEO (50.00) vs ONEO (50.00).
| ONEO | XMHQ | ONEO / XMHQ | |
| Gain YTD | 9.935 | 7.687 | 129% |
| Net Assets | 96.3M | 5.23B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.25 | 80% |
| Turnover | 50.00 | 58.00 | 86% |
| Yield | 1.31 | 0.63 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ONEO | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ONEO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONEO has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONEO jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONEO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONEO | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| BLDR - ONEO | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.10% | ||
| RS - ONEO | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| LRCX - ONEO | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| WSM - ONEO | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| CTSH - ONEO | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||
XMHQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMHQ has been closely correlated with AIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMHQ jumps, then AIT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMHQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMHQ | 100% | +1.30% | ||
| AIT - XMHQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| SEIC - XMHQ | 79% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| GGG - XMHQ | 77% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| VNT - XMHQ | 77% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| DCI - XMHQ | 76% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
More | ||||