| ONEO | XMHQ | ONEO / XMHQ | |
| Gain YTD | 19.975 | 12.369 | 161% |
| Net Assets | 30.4M | 5.42B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.25 | 80% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 65.00 | 65% |
| Yield | 1.16 | 0.55 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 20 years | - |
| ONEO | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 75% | 10 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CGCV | 32.74 | 0.18 | +0.55% |
| Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF | |||
| DMAX | 27.73 | 0.06 | +0.21% |
| iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Dec ETF | |||
| SLWS | 101.02 | N/A | N/A |
| SLW Short Duration Income ETF | |||
| VABS | 24.00 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| Virtus Newfleet Securitized Income ETF | |||
| NVYY | 11.58 | -0.01 | -0.13% |
| GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONEO has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONEO jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONEO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONEO | 100% | N/A | ||
| BLDR - ONEO | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| RS - ONEO | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| LRCX - ONEO | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| WSM - ONEO | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| CTSH - ONEO | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.88% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMHQ has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMHQ jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMHQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMHQ | 100% | +0.63% | ||
| ITT - XMHQ | 75% Closely correlated | +4.03% | ||
| FBIN - XMHQ | 73% Closely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| NDSN - XMHQ | 73% Closely correlated | +2.28% | ||
| AVNT - XMHQ | 73% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| EVR - XMHQ | 71% Closely correlated | -0.85% | ||
More | ||||