Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ONOF vs RECS
ONOF vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ONOF vs. RECS commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONOF is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.95B vs. ONOF (138M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than ONOF: RECS (17.013) vs ONOF (6.768). ONOF was incepted earlier than RECS: ONOF (5 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than ONOF (0.39). ONOF has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| ONOF | RECS | ONOF / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 6.768 | 17.013 | 40% |
| Net Assets | 138M | 3.95B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.15 | 260% |
| Turnover | 241.46 | 49.00 | 493% |
| Yield | 1.08 | 0.60 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ONOF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 70% | 11 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ONOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONOF has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONOF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONOF | 100% | -0.00% | ||
| MSFT - ONOF | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| META - ONOF | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| AMZN - ONOF | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| AAPL - ONOF | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| NVDA - ONOF | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
More | ||||