Ad is loading...
ONOF vs RECS
ONOF vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ONOF vs. RECS commentary
Apr 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONOF is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.24B vs. ONOF (113M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than ONOF: RECS (-8.954) vs ONOF (-13.140). ONOF was incepted earlier than RECS: ONOF (4 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than ONOF (0.40). ONOF has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| ONOF | RECS | ONOF / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -13.140 | -8.954 | 147% |
| Net Assets | 113M | 2.24B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.15 | 267% |
| Turnover | 241.46 | 49.00 | 493% |
| Yield | 1.01 | 0.73 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ONOF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 85% | 13 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ONOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONOF has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONOF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONOF | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| MSFT - ONOF | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| META - ONOF | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| AMZN - ONOF | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| AAPL - ONOF | 57% Loosely correlated | +4.06% | ||
| NVDA - ONOF | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.12% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +1.68% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||