Ad is loading...
ONOF vs RECS
ONOF vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ONOF vs. RECS commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONOF is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.56B vs. ONOF (137M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than ONOF: RECS (29.484) vs ONOF (23.159). ONOF was incepted earlier than RECS: ONOF (4 years) vs RECS (5 years). ONOF has a higher turnover RECS (45.00) vs RECS (45.00).
| ONOF | RECS | ONOF / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 23.159 | 29.484 | 79% |
| Net Assets | 137M | 1.56B | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 574.56 | 45.00 | 1,277% |
| Yield | 1.24 | 0.89 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ONOF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 85% | 15 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 6 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SPICX | 60.81 | -0.24 | -0.39% |
| Invesco S&P 500 Index C | |||
| CCGIX | 24.73 | -0.10 | -0.40% |
| Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl | |||
| EPLKX | 20.55 | -0.14 | -0.68% |
| NYLI Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Class C | |||
| CAMSX | 17.46 | -0.20 | -1.13% |
| Cambiar Small Cap Inv | |||
| RMFGX | 56.23 | -3.03 | -5.11% |
| American Funds American Mutual R6 | |||
ONOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONOF has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONOF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONOF | 100% | -0.36% | ||
| MSFT - ONOF | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| META - ONOF | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| AMZN - ONOF | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| AAPL - ONOF | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| NVDA - ONOF | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More | ||||