Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ONOF vs RECS
ONOF vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts ONOF vs RECS
ONOF vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ONOF vs. RECS commentary
Aug 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONOF is a Hold and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 6.04B vs. ONOF (141M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than ONOF: RECS (11.582) vs ONOF (9.868). ONOF was incepted earlier than RECS: ONOF (6 years) vs RECS (7 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than ONOF (0.39). ONOF has a higher turnover RECS (32.00) vs RECS (32.00).
| ONOF | RECS | ONOF / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 9.868 | 11.582 | 85% |
| Net Assets | 141M | 6.04B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.15 | 260% |
| Turnover | 364.95 | 32.00 | 1,140% |
| Yield | 1.24 | 0.74 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ONOF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 71% | 11 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
ONOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONOF has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONOF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONOF | 100% | +0.67% | ||
| MSFT - ONOF | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| META - ONOF | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| AMZN - ONOF | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| AAPL - ONOF | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| NVDA - ONOF | 56% Loosely correlated | +8.74% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +3.85% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
More | ||||