Advertisement
OPHC vs WSBK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OPHC is a Hold and WSBK is a Buy.
| OPHC | WSBK | OPHC / WSBK | |
| Capitalization | 114M | 116M | 98% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 113.412 | 24.019 | 472% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.43 | 26.45 | 39% |
| Revenue | 58.8M | 24.9M | 236% |
| Total Cash | 15.4M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 41.5M | 147M | 28% |
OPHC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 23 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| OPHC | WSBK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 14% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 21% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 8% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 21% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 5% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 64% | 11 days ago 34% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 25% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 40% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 54% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OPHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while WSBK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- OPHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WSBK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OPHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSBK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- OPHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- WSBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
OPHC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.00% price change this week, while WSBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
OPHC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.96% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
OPHC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OPHC and NKSH have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OPHC and NKSH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OPHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPHC | 100% | N/A | ||
| NKSH - OPHC | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
| FBIZ - OPHC | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
| CFBK - OPHC | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
| SRCE - OPHC | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.54% | ||
| FMAO - OPHC | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||
WSBK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WSBK and BOTJ have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WSBK and BOTJ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WSBK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WSBK | 100% | N/A | ||
| BOTJ - WSBK | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
| CFBK - WSBK | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
| WBS - WSBK | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OPHC - WSBK | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MGYR - WSBK | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.08% | ||
More | ||||