ORCX
Price
$22.38
Change
-$0.91 (-3.91%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
236.57M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QLD
Price
$89.55
Change
+$1.53 (+1.74%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
13.86B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ORCX vs QLD

ORCX vs QLD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) vs. ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD)

Key Takeaways

  • ORCX provides daily 2x leveraged exposure to a single stock, Oracle Corporation (ORCL), while QLD delivers daily 2x exposure to the broad Nasdaq-100 Index.
  • ORCX employs an actively managed strategy using swaps and Treasury bills, resulting in higher expense ratio of 1.36% and concentrated risk compared to QLD’s passive index approach at 0.95%.
  • QLD offers greater diversification across approximately 100 large-cap technology and growth companies, whereas ORCX maintains exposure primarily through derivatives tied to one underlying security.
  • Both funds use daily rebalancing and derivatives, making them suitable for short-term tactical trading rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies due to compounding effects in volatile markets.
  • ORCX features fewer holdings and higher structural complexity from single-stock swaps, while QLD benefits from established liquidity and broader sector representation within information technology and communication services.
  • Expense efficiency and diversification favor QLD structurally, though ORCX targets investors seeking amplified exposure to specific company performance within the technology sector.

Introduction

ORCX and QLD represent two distinct leveraged strategies within the technology sector, appealing to investors seeking amplified daily returns. ORCX focuses on a single company, while QLD targets a broad index of leading growth stocks. They do not compete directly but provide alternative leveraged exposure for different risk appetites and objectives. In the current environment of artificial intelligence advancements and technology sector rotation, these funds illustrate how investors can pursue magnified exposure either through concentrated single-stock bets or diversified index participation. Understanding their structural differences helps clarify positioning for short-term tactical use amid ongoing market volatility and sector momentum.

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) Overview

ORCX is an actively managed leveraged ETF that seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily percentage change in the share price of Oracle Corporation (ORCL). Launched in February 2025, it uses swap agreements and Treasury bills to achieve its objective rather than holding the underlying stock directly. The fund typically maintains around 10 holdings dominated by various swap contracts and short-term government securities. Its expense ratio stands at 1.36%. As a single-stock leveraged product, ORCX exhibits high concentration risk and requires daily rebalancing. This structure distinguishes it as a tactical tool for those seeking amplified exposure to one technology company’s performance.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

QLD is a passively managed leveraged ETF that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to 200% of the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. Established in June 2006, it employs swaps and other derivatives to deliver magnified index exposure. The fund holds approximately 100 to 120 positions, with significant allocations to major technology names and cash equivalents for liquidity management. Its net expense ratio is 0.95%. QLD benefits from broad diversification across large-cap growth companies in technology, communication services, and consumer sectors. Daily rebalancing maintains the target leverage, supporting its role as an established vehicle for index-level amplified returns.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector, particularly companies driving artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and semiconductor innovation, continues to influence both funds. Macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations, corporate earnings cycles, and capital flows into growth equities shape the environment. Regulatory developments around data privacy and antitrust scrutiny in big technology add complexity. Sector risks include valuation compression during risk-off periods and sensitivity to economic slowdowns. Capital continues to flow toward leaders in artificial intelligence infrastructure, supporting thematic momentum while highlighting volatility inherent in leveraged products tied to this dynamic space.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, QLD has delivered broader participation in Nasdaq-100 rallies driven by multiple large-cap technology contributors, resulting in relatively moderated volatility compared to single-stock products. ORCX has shown sharper moves tied directly to Oracle Corporation (ORCL) earnings and news, amplifying both gains and losses. During periods of sector rotation favoring diversified technology exposure, QLD’s index structure has provided more consistent positioning. Interest rate sensitivity and earnings momentum among top holdings have influenced relative behavior, with QLD benefiting from multiple drivers while ORCX remains dependent on one company’s trajectory. Both exhibit elevated volatility characteristic of daily leveraged strategies.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to discover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, diversification profile, and broader sector momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently favor QLD. Its lower expense ratio, established passive methodology, and exposure across numerous high-quality growth companies provide a more balanced risk exposure within the leveraged technology segment compared to the concentrated single-stock approach of ORCX.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ORCX vs. QLD commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ORCX is a Hold and QLD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 13.9B vs. ORCX (237M). QLD has a higher annual dividend yield than ORCX: QLD (27.295) vs ORCX (-56.703). ORCX was incepted earlier than QLD: ORCX (2 years) vs QLD (20 years). QLD (0.95) has a lower expense ratio than ORCX (1.36). ORCX has a higher turnover QLD (23.00) vs QLD (23.00).
ORCXQLDORCX / QLD
Gain YTD-56.70327.295-208%
Net Assets237M13.9B2%
Total Expense Ratio1.360.95143%
Turnover541.0023.002,352%
Yield0.000.13-
Fund Existence2 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ORCXQLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
ORCX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBNCX15.430.07
+0.46%
Neuberger International Sel C
RYECX271.82N/A
N/A
Rydex Energy C
CFJIX41.87N/A
N/A
Calvert US Large Cap Value Rspnb Idx I
CSJIX72.09N/A
N/A
Cohen & Steers Realty Shares I
HSMNX46.05N/A
N/A
Horizon Multi-Factor Small/Mid Cap Inv

ORCX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ORCX and ORCL have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ORCX and ORCL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ORCX
1D Price
Change %
ORCX100%
-3.91%
ORCL - ORCX
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%

QLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been loosely correlated with SWKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then SWKS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLD
1D Price
Change %
QLD100%
+1.74%
SWKS - QLD
61%
Loosely correlated
+5.14%
ZM - QLD
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
DOCU - QLD
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
ALGN - QLD
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
OKTA - QLD
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
More