Comparing two regional bank stocks such as Old Second Bancorp (OSBC) and RBB Bancorp (RBB) offers a revealing look at how community and regional banks are navigating the current interest rate environment, credit cycles, and competitive landscape. Both institutions serve as essential credit providers in their respective markets, yet they differ significantly in scale, geographic focus, profitability metrics, and near-term catalysts. This stock comparison is relevant for investors who track the banking sector and are evaluating relative performance, growth potential, and risk-adjusted returns in the regional banking space. By examining each bank's recent results, market positioning, and strategic direction, this analysis provides a clear, data-driven picture of where these two financial institutions stand today.
Old Second Bancorp, headquartered in Aurora, Illinois, is the parent company of Old Second National Bank — one of the Chicago area's longest-standing financial institutions, tracing its roots back to 1871. OSBC operates a diversified community banking model offering commercial and consumer loans, deposit services, wealth management, and mortgage products across its branch network. The most transformative development for the bank in recent quarters has been its acquisition of Bancorp Financial, Inc. and its subsidiary Evergreen Bank Group, which closed in July 2025. This transaction added approximately $1.4 billion in assets, significantly expanded the bank's consumer lending capabilities — particularly in the powersports segment — and meaningfully enhanced its competitive position in the Chicago metropolitan market.
In recent market activity, OSBC delivered a standout fourth quarter of 2025, reporting net income of $28.8 million, or $0.54 per diluted share, with adjusted earnings reaching $30.8 million, or $0.58 per share. The bank's net interest margin (NIM) — a key measure of lending profitability — reached an impressive 5.09% on a tax-equivalent basis, placing it well above the regional bank peer average. Return on average tangible common equity (ROATCE), another critical profitability gauge, stood at 16.15% for the quarter. Tangible book value per share grew to $14.12, reflecting a 14% increase over the prior year. The integration of Evergreen Bank has proceeded ahead of management's initial expectations, and CEO Jim Eccher has emphasized that earnings accretion estimates appear conservative as asset yields have exceeded internal projections.
RBB Bancorp, based in Los Angeles, California, is the holding company for Royal Business Bank and RBB Asset Management Company. RBB primarily serves the Asian-American business community across Southern California and has built a specialized commercial banking franchise with a heavy emphasis on commercial real estate and residential mortgage lending. The bank's loan portfolio is notably concentrated in non-qualified mortgage (non-QM) residential loans in New York and California, representing roughly 50% of total loans, with an average loan-to-value ratio (LTV) of 54%.
The defining narrative for RBB over the past year has been a determined credit cleanup effort. During fiscal 2025, nonperforming loans decreased by 45% and nonperforming assets declined by 34%. Classified and criticized loans fell 43% year over year, and at the end of the fourth quarter of 2025, stood at $94.4 million. Net income for Q4 2025 reached $10.2 million, or $0.59 per diluted share — more than double the same quarter a year earlier. For the full fiscal year 2025, net income totaled $31.9 million, or $1.83 per diluted share, a 24.5% increase in earnings per share compared to fiscal 2024. Loan growth was solid at 8.6% for the year, supported by $713 million in originations — a 32% increase over 2024. The bank also returned $25.3 million to shareholders through dividends ($0.16 per quarter) and share buybacks, while tangible book value per share rose 7.8% to $26.42. Net interest margin improved steadily throughout the year, ending at 2.99%.
Investors seeking to move beyond manual stock analysis increasingly turn to AI-driven trading tools. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of top-performing algorithmic trading bots from a universe of hundreds, each designed to trade thousands of different tickers across diverse market conditions. These AI trading bots employ varied strategies, trading styles, and timeframes — from swing trading to long-term trend following — with some bots delivering statistically significant track records. Only the most consistent and market-adaptive bots earn a place in the Trending section, making it a valuable discovery tool for both experienced traders and those new to automated investing. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help market participants identify algorithmic strategies aligned with their risk tolerance and investment objectives.
When placed side by side, OSBC and RBB reveal sharp contrasts in nearly every meaningful category. In terms of profitability, OSBC holds a commanding lead: its net interest margin of 5.09% is roughly 210 basis points wider than RBB's 2.99%, and its ROATCE of 16.15% dwarfs the single-digit returns that RBB has been generating as it works through credit challenges. This margin advantage reflects OSBC's higher-yielding loan mix — enhanced by the Evergreen acquisition — and its relatively lower-cost deposit base in the Midwest.
On the other hand, RBB offers a more compelling shareholder return story in the near term, with a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share that significantly exceeds OSBC's $0.07 payout. RBB's aggressive share repurchase program — which reduced outstanding shares by approximately 4% in 2025 — further supports per-share metrics. From a risk standpoint, RBB carries a notably higher loan-to-deposit ratio near 99%, which may constrain balance sheet flexibility, whereas OSBC maintains a more conservative ratio following its acquisition. Geographic exposure also diverges: OSBC is anchored in the economically diverse Chicago metro area, while RBB's concentration in Southern California and New York real estate markets introduces different cyclical sensitivities. Both banks maintain solid capital cushions, with OSBC reporting a Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio of 12.99% and RBB operating comfortably above regulatory well-capitalized thresholds.
Based on observable market data and the comparative metrics outlined above, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor Old Second Bancorp (OSBC) in the current environment. The combination of a superior net interest margin, a successful and accretive acquisition that is already delivering above-expected results, and a stronger return on tangible equity suggests more consistent trend strength and a higher-quality earnings profile. While RBB Bancorp (RBB) presents an attractive turnaround narrative with improving credit metrics and robust capital returns to shareholders, the lingering credit overhang and tighter liquidity position introduce greater uncertainty. An AI model weighing momentum, profitability, and risk-adjusted stability would therefore assign a higher probability of favorable near-to-medium-term performance to OSBC, while acknowledging that RBB could close the gap if its credit normalization continues at the current pace and net interest margin expansion materializes further.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OSBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRBB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OSBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
OSBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.53% price change this week, while RBB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.
OSBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
RBB is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| OSBC | RBB | OSBC / RBB | |
| Capitalization | 1.29B | 448M | 288% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.954 | 30.429 | 102% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.14 | 10.85 | 140% |
| Revenue | 354M | 135M | 262% |
| Total Cash | 48.1M | 23.9M | 201% |
| Total Debt | 300M | 290M | 103% |
OSBC | RBB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 77 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RBB's Valuation (32) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OSBC (69). This means that RBB’s stock grew somewhat faster than OSBC’s over the last 12 months.
OSBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBB (77). This means that OSBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBB’s over the last 12 months.
OSBC's SMR Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RBB (69). This means that OSBC’s stock grew similarly to RBB’s over the last 12 months.
OSBC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RBB (43). This means that OSBC’s stock grew similarly to RBB’s over the last 12 months.
OSBC's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBB (77). This means that OSBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBB’s over the last 12 months.
| OSBC | RBB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 19 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 54% | 5 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 8 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 61% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBB has been closely correlated with GSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RBB jumps, then GSBC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RBB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBB | 100% | +1.03% | ||
| GSBC - RBB | 74% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| FMBH - RBB | 73% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| HOPE - RBB | 73% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| OSBC - RBB | 72% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| UVSP - RBB | 72% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
More | ||||