Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OTCBX vs PEMGX
OTCBX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts OTCBX vs PEMGX
OTCBX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OTCBX vs. PEMGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTCBX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.8B vs. OTCBX (14.1B). OTCBX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . OTCBX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: OTCBX (32 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). OTCBX (1.79) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). OTCBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). OTCBX (1000) and PEMGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.45 vs. OTCBX (-10.82). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 25.57 vs. OTCBX (2.03).
| OTCBX | PEMGX | OTCBX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.91 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.91 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.325 | -0.680 | -48% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.1B | 30.8B | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.82 | -6.45 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.96 | 32.28 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.03 | 25.57 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.09 | 89.67 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers