Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OTCBX vs PEMGX
OTCBX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts OTCBX vs PEMGX
OTCBX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OTCBX vs. PEMGX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTCBX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 21.3B vs. OTCBX (12.5B). OTCBX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . OTCBX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: OTCBX (33 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). OTCBX (1.78) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). OTCBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). OTCBX (1000) and PEMGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -17.28 vs. OTCBX (-24.93). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -8.45 vs. OTCBX (-29.91).
| OTCBX | PEMGX | OTCBX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.90 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.90 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.502 | -7.169 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 21.3B | 59% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -24.93 | -17.28 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.26 | 10.36 | -60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.91 | -8.45 | 354% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.07 | 73.28 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers