Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OTFCX vs RGACX
OTFCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts OTFCX vs RGACX
OTFCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OTFCX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTFCX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. OTFCX (6.28B). OTFCX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . OTFCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: OTFCX (33 years) vs RGACX (24 years). OTFCX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). OTFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than OTFCX: RGACX (250) vs OTFCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. OTFCX (-6.94). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. OTFCX (-24.28).
| OTFCX | RGACX | OTFCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.93 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.93 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.984 | 6.959 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.28B | 357B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.94 | 3.68 | -189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.14 | 37.13 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.28 | 13.46 | -180% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.00 | 97.58 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement