Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OTFCX vs RGAGX
OTFCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts OTFCX vs RGAGX
OTFCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OTFCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTFCX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. OTFCX (6.37B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than OTFCX: RGAGX (0.51) vs OTFCX (0.00). OTFCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: OTFCX (33 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). OTFCX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). OTFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than OTFCX: RGAGX (250) vs OTFCX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. OTFCX (-1.30). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 27.14 vs. OTFCX (-17.31).
| OTFCX | RGAGX | OTFCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.29 | 586% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.29 | 586% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.733 | 10.599 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 338B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.30 | 15.41 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.02 | 55.31 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.31 | 27.14 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.96 | 117.06 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers