OUSM vs SEIC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OUSM is a Hold and SEIC is a Hold.
SEIC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| OUSM | SEIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 56% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DAUG | 37.49 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bfr ETF Aug | |||
| BSCV | 16.23 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corp Bd ETF | |||
| SPXV | 56.50 | N/A | N/A |
| ProShares S&P 500® ex-Health Care | |||
| IGIB | 51.84 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares 5-10 Year invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF | |||
| DWUS | 44.37 | N/A | N/A |
| AdvisorShares DW FSM US Core ETF | |||
OUSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OUSM has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OUSM jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OUSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OUSM | 100% | +0.71% | ||
| UFPI - OUSM | 80% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| ITT - OUSM | 76% Closely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| WTS - OUSM | 75% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| SEIC - OUSM | 74% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| HLNE - OUSM | 74% Closely correlated | +1.98% | ||
More | ||||
SEIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEIC | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| TROW - SEIC | 78% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| BN - SEIC | 77% Closely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| AMG - SEIC | 75% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| STT - SEIC | 74% Closely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| IVZ - SEIC | 74% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
More | ||||