OVCHF
Price
$12.55
Change
-$0.25 (-1.95%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
56.92B
PBAM
Price
$58.90
Change
-$0.06 (-0.10%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
341.93M
21 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OVCHF vs PBAM

Header iconOVCHF vs PBAM Comparison
Open Charts OVCHF vs PBAMBanner chart's image
Overseas Chinese Banking
Price$12.55
Change-$0.25 (-1.95%)
Volume$488
Capitalization56.92B
Private Bancorp of America
Price$58.90
Change-$0.06 (-0.10%)
Volume$1.33K
Capitalization341.93M
OVCHF vs PBAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OVCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OVCHF vs. PBAM commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OVCHF is a Hold and PBAM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (OVCHF: $12.55 vs. PBAM: $58.90)
Brand notoriety: OVCHF and PBAM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OVCHF: 50% vs. PBAM: 28%
Market capitalization -- OVCHF: $56.92B vs. PBAM: $341.93M
OVCHF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $56.92B. PBAM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $341.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $164.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OVCHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePBAM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OVCHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PBAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PBAM is a better buy in the long-term than OVCHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OVCHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBAM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OVCHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PBAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBAM is a better buy in the short-term than OVCHF.

Price Growth

OVCHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.46% price change this week, while PBAM (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

PBAM is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.65% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OVCHF($56.9B) has a higher market cap than PBAM($342M). OVCHF has higher P/E ratio than PBAM: OVCHF (10.00) vs PBAM (8.35). OVCHF YTD gains are higher at: 2.240 vs. PBAM (2.009). PBAM has less debt than OVCHF: PBAM (29M) vs OVCHF (30.3B).
OVCHFPBAMOVCHF / PBAM
Capitalization56.9B342M16,637%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.2402.009112%
P/E Ratio10.008.35120%
Revenue14.4BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt30.3B29M104,483%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OVCHF vs PBAM: Fundamental Ratings
OVCHF
PBAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7818
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
164
SMR RATING
1..100
534
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5848
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3719
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PBAM's Valuation (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OVCHF (84). This means that PBAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than OVCHF’s over the last 12 months.

PBAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as OVCHF (16). This means that PBAM’s stock grew similarly to OVCHF’s over the last 12 months.

OVCHF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as PBAM (34). This means that OVCHF’s stock grew similarly to PBAM’s over the last 12 months.

PBAM's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as OVCHF (58). This means that PBAM’s stock grew similarly to OVCHF’s over the last 12 months.

PBAM's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as OVCHF (37). This means that PBAM’s stock grew similarly to OVCHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OVCHFPBAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
35%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OVCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SENCX80.80N/A
N/A
Touchstone Large Cap Focused A
BHSRX57.14N/A
N/A
BlackRock Health Sciences Opps R
SXPRX54.23N/A
N/A
DWS S&P 500 Index R6
AVEMX27.79N/A
N/A
Ave Maria Value
QSERX19.89N/A
N/A
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style R6

OVCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OVCHF and CIXPF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OVCHF and CIXPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OVCHF
1D Price
Change %
OVCHF100%
N/A
CIXPF - OVCHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORBN - OVCHF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBAM - OVCHF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
OVCHY - OVCHF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
ORPB - OVCHF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
More

PBAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBAM and SQCF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBAM and SQCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBAM
1D Price
Change %
PBAM100%
-0.10%
SQCF - PBAM
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
CBGPY - PBAM
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
BANF - PBAM
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
PBHC - PBAM
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
PCLB - PBAM
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
More