Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OWACX vs RGACX
OWACX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts OWACX vs RGACX
Old Westbury All Cap Core
Price$27.53
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.47B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.01
Change+$0.47 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
OWACX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OWACX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OWACX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. OWACX (3.47B). RGACX pays higher dividends than OWACX: RGACX (0.07) vs OWACX (0.00). OWACX was incepted earlier than RGACX: OWACX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). OWACX (0.96) and RGACX (0.94) have similar cost to investors . OWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than OWACX: RGACX (250) vs OWACX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.27 vs. OWACX (-0.43). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.40 vs. OWACX (31.53).
| OWACX | RGACX | OWACX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.94 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.94 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.742 | 19.475 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.47B | 341B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.43 | 14.27 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.95 | 74.11 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.53 | 42.40 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.47 | 101.13 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement