Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OWACX vs RGACX
OWACX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts OWACX vs RGACX
OWACX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OWACX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OWACX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. OWACX (3.5B). OWACX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . OWACX was incepted earlier than RGACX: OWACX (28 years) vs RGACX (24 years). OWACX (0.95) and RGACX (0.93) have similar cost to investors . OWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than OWACX: RGACX (250) vs OWACX (1000). OWACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.14 vs. RGACX (6.33). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.29 vs. OWACX (11.58).
| OWACX | RGACX | OWACX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.93 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.93 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 6.417 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.5B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.14 | 6.33 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.64 | 43.37 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.58 | 13.29 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.80 | 108.42 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement