Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OWACX vs RGAGX
OWACX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts OWACX vs RGAGX
OWACX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OWACX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OWACX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. OWACX (3.5B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than OWACX: RGAGX (0.51) vs OWACX (0.00). OWACX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: OWACX (28 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). OWACX (0.95) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). OWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than OWACX: RGAGX (250) vs OWACX (1000). OWACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.14 vs. RGAGX (7.43). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.57 vs. OWACX (11.58).
| OWACX | RGAGX | OWACX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.29 | 328% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.29 | 328% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 6.764 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.5B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.14 | 7.43 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.64 | 47.41 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.58 | 17.57 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.80 | 117.77 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement