Advertisement
OWL vs PAX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OWL is a Hold and PAX is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OWL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- OWL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PAX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OWL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PAX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
OWL (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.25% price change this week, while PAX (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.35%.
Reported Earning Dates
OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
PAX is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-2.06% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| OWL | PAX | OWL / PAX | |
| Capitalization | 10.7B | 2.24B | 479% |
| EBITDA | 804M | 138M | 583% |
| Gain YTD | -28.002 | 24.949 | -112% |
| P/E Ratio | 147.73 | 26.02 | 568% |
| Revenue | 2.62B | 398M | 658% |
| Total Cash | 118M | 165M | 72% |
| Total Debt | 3.65B | 161M | 2,266% |
| OWL | PAX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 18 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SNOU | 62.03 | 0.22 | +0.36% |
| T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF | |||
| WINN | 31.68 | N/A | N/A |
| Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF | |||
| AVEE | 63.86 | -0.47 | -0.73% |
| Avantis Emerging Markets Sm Cp Eq ETF | |||
| XSLV | 45.52 | -0.35 | -0.77% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF | |||
| AAPW | 40.39 | -0.90 | -2.18% |
| Roundhill AAPL WeeklyPay ETF | |||
PAX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAX has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAX jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAX | 100% | -0.64% | ||
| BN - PAX | 67% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| CG - PAX | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| VINP - PAX | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| SEIC - PAX | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| OWL - PAX | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
More | ||||