OWL
Price
$9.50
Change
+$0.46 (+5.09%)
Updated
Jul 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.41B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAX
Price
$11.15
Change
+$0.05 (+0.45%)
Updated
Jul 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.78B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OWL vs PAX

OWL vs PAX Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OWL vs. PAX commentary
Jul 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OWL is a Hold and PAX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2026
Stock price -- (OWL: $9.49 vs. PAX: $11.10)
Brand notoriety: OWL and PAX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OWL: 72% vs. PAX: 44%
Market capitalization -- OWL: $6.41B vs. PAX: $1.78B
OWL [@Investment Managers] is valued at $6.41B. PAX’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $156.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PAX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both OWL and PAX are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OWL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PAX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAX is a better buy in the short-term than OWL.

Price Growth

OWL (@Investment Managers) experienced а +11.38% price change this week, while PAX (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

PAX is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.52% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($6.41B) has a higher market cap than PAX($1.78B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than PAX: OWL (76.92) vs PAX (21.15). PAX YTD gains are higher at: -28.363 vs. OWL (-33.696). OWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 951M vs. PAX (155M). OWL has more cash in the bank: 190M vs. PAX (26.5M). PAX has less debt than OWL: PAX (171M) vs OWL (4.36B). OWL has higher revenues than PAX: OWL (2.94B) vs PAX (382M).
OWLPAXOWL / PAX
Capitalization6.41B1.78B360%
EBITDA951M155M614%
Gain YTD-33.696-28.363119%
P/E Ratio76.9221.15364%
Revenue2.94B382M770%
Total Cash190M26.5M717%
Total Debt4.36B171M2,548%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OWLPAX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMTM308.563.77
+1.24%
State Street® SPDR® S&P® 1500MomtTiltETF
DGIN35.61N/A
+0.01%
VanEck Digital India ETF
QQQM290.95N/A
N/A
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
FDRX19.38N/A
N/A
Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF
SAMT45.86-0.15
-0.33%
Strategas Macro Thematic Opp ETF

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
+4.98%
ARES - OWL
78%
Closely correlated
+4.22%
BX - OWL
74%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
TPG - OWL
73%
Closely correlated
N/A
KKR - OWL
71%
Closely correlated
+2.27%
APO - OWL
71%
Closely correlated
+3.00%
More