Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAARX vs RLBFX
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$17.00
Change-$0.08 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.33B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.78
Change-$0.16 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.89B
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 264B vs. PAARX (2.33B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PAARX (3.04) vs RLBFX (1.97). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PAARX (23 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PAARX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.13 vs. PAARX (1.80). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.76 vs. PAARX (15.63).
| PAARX | RLBFX | PAARX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.285 | 14.008 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.33B | 264B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 1.97 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.80 | 9.13 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.05 | 41.78 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.63 | 39.76 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.84 | 73.89 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement