Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAARX vs RLBFX
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$16.78
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.52
Change-$0.09 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. PAARX (2.27B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PAARX (2.81) vs RLBFX (2.08). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PAARX (23 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PAARX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.29 vs. PAARX (2.95). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.76 vs. PAARX (18.17).
| PAARX | RLBFX | PAARX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.146 | 9.922 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 256B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.81 | 2.08 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.95 | 8.29 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.66 | 30.56 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.17 | 39.76 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.72 | 69.21 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement