Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAARX vs RLBFX
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$16.95
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.08
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. PAARX (2.29B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PAARX (2.75) vs RLBFX (2.05). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PAARX (23 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PAARX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. PAARX (3.38). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.46 vs. PAARX (18.61).
| PAARX | RLBFX | PAARX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.121 | 11.562 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 259B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.75 | 2.05 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.38 | 10.28 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.68 | 40.92 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.61 | 41.46 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.11 | 78.40 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement