Ad is loading...
PAARX vs RLBFX
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$15.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$34.74
Change+$0.17 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.28B
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBFX commentary
Mar 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 237B vs. PAARX (2.11B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PAARX: RLBFX (2.19) vs PAARX (1.96). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PAARX (22 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (171.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PAARX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.45 vs. PAARX (0.64). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.21 vs. PAARX (17.04).
| PAARX | RLBFX | PAARX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.30 | 393% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.30 | 393% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.511 | 1.018 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 237B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 2.19 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.64 | 5.45 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.33 | 18.06 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.04 | 36.21 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.12 | 55.88 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...