Ad is loading...
PAARX vs RLBFX
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$14.86
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$33.02
Change-$0.08 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.9B
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBFX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. PAARX (2.01B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PAARX (2.48) vs RLBFX (2.26). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PAARX (22 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (171.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PAARX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.88 vs. PAARX (-2.27). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.40 vs. PAARX (15.98).
| PAARX | RLBFX | PAARX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.30 | 393% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.30 | 393% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.321 | -3.617 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 225B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 2.26 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.27 | 2.88 | -79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.29 | 10.75 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.98 | 33.40 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.55 | 47.01 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...