Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAARX vs RLBFX
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$16.10
Change-$0.14 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.18B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$35.69
Change-$0.31 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. PAARX (2.18B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PAARX (2.39) vs RLBFX (2.18). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PAARX (22 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PAARX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.61 vs. PAARX (0.61). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.09 vs. PAARX (20.94).
| PAARX | RLBFX | PAARX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.564 | 4.560 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 244B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.39 | 2.18 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.61 | 5.61 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.02 | 33.66 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.94 | 40.09 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.85 | 60.51 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement