Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAARX vs RLBFX
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$16.59
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.27
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. PAARX (2.25B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PAARX: RLBFX (2.10) vs PAARX (1.97). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PAARX (23 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PAARX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.60 vs. PAARX (3.95). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.40 vs. PAARX (19.74).
| PAARX | RLBFX | PAARX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.782 | 9.189 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 254B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 2.10 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.95 | 10.60 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.70 | 35.79 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.74 | 41.40 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.26 | 68.15 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers