Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAARX vs RLBFX
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$17.31
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.34B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.03
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.73B
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. PAARX (2.34B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PAARX (2.35) vs RLBFX (2.00). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PAARX (23 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PAARX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.17 vs. PAARX (3.47). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.85 vs. PAARX (22.54).
| PAARX | RLBFX | PAARX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.460 | 14.743 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 266B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 2.00 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.47 | 10.17 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.84 | 48.45 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.54 | 46.85 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.33 | 81.97 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement