Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAARX vs RLBFX
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBFX
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. PAARX (3.17B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PAARX (2.44) vs RLBFX (2.02). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PAARX (23 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). PAARX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PAARX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.07 vs. PAARX (13.73). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.80 vs. PAARX (9.25).
| PAARX | RLBFX | PAARX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.30 | 383% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.30 | 383% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.019 | 9.536 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.17B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.44 | 2.02 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.73 | 17.07 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.44 | 45.61 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.25 | 37.80 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.66 | 93.65 | 58% |