Advertisement
PAAS vs SILJ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAAS is a Buy and SILJ is a Hold.
PAAS in upward trend: price expected to rise as it breaks its lower Bollinger Band on October 30, 2026
PAAS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 30 of 33 cases where PAAS's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for PAAS's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.
Following a +4.04% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PAAS advanced for three days, in 241 of 299 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day moving average for PAAS crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 10 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 59%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PAAS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.
The Aroon Indicator for PAAS entered a downward trend on October 30, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 43 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.140) is normal, around the industry mean (1.747). P/E Ratio (11.237) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-12.607). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.030) is also within normal values, averaging (2.614). Dividend Yield (0.019) settles around the average of (0.351) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.533) is also within normal values, averaging (7.321).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 43 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 63 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. PAAS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 64 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 67, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
SILJ in downward trend: price dove below 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026
SILJ moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 33 of 36 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day moving average for SILJ crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 30, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 13 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SILJ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
The Aroon Indicator for SILJ entered a downward trend on October 30, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for SILJ's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 55 of 58 cases where SILJ's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Following a +5.19% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SILJ advanced for three days, in 281 of 307 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
SILJ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
PAAS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| PAAS | SILJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PAAS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while .
- PAAS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PAAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- PAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
PAAS (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.40% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
PAAS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-4.21% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
Advertisement
SILJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILJ has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SILJ jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SILJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILJ | 100% | -5.78% | ||
| PAAS - SILJ | 93% Closely correlated | -6.80% | ||
| WPM - SILJ | 92% Closely correlated | -5.42% | ||
| CDE - SILJ | 92% Closely correlated | -6.70% | ||
| SKE - SILJ | 90% Closely correlated | -5.30% | ||
| OR - SILJ | 88% Closely correlated | -4.44% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ESBG | 20.22 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) | |||
| MMCA | 21.13 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| NYLIM MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF (MMCA) | |||
| BUYB | 43.77 | -0.32 | -0.73% |
| ProShares S&P 500 Buyback Aristocrats ETF (BUYB) | |||
| FCOM | 64.68 | -0.89 | -1.36% |
| Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) | |||
| NJAN | 59.78 | -0.84 | -1.39% |
| Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) | |||