Advertisement
PAAS vs WPM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Pan American Silver (PAAS) vs. Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both PAAS and WPM have gained from strong precious metals prices in recent market activity, with silver supporting industrial and investment demand.
- WPM outperforms year-to-date (YTD, performance from January 1) at 6.02% compared to PAAS's 1.41%.
- PAAS provides a higher dividend yield of 1.04% versus WPM's 0.62%, appealing to income-focused investors.
- Analyst price targets indicate substantial upside potential: around 40% for PAAS and 50% for WPM.
- WPM's streaming model offers lower risk (beta of 1.17) than PAAS's mining operations (beta of 1.53).
- Both stocks await Q1 2026 earnings, potentially catalyzing further relative performance shifts.
Introduction
This comparison examines PAAS, a major silver producer, and WPM, a leading precious metals streaming company. Both provide exposure to silver, which has seen robust demand from solar energy, electronics, and as an inflation hedge amid economic uncertainty. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors building portfolios in the metals sector will find value in understanding their business models, recent price behaviors, and market positioning. With precious metals rallying in recent weeks, relative performance highlights trade-offs between operational leverage and stability.
PAAS Overview and Recent Performance
Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) operates a diversified portfolio of silver and gold mines across the Americas. In recent quarters, the company reported record financial results for Q4 and full-year 2025, driven by higher metal prices and strong production. Stock performance has shown resilience amid sector volatility, with shares experiencing dips but rebounding on positive developments like the La Colorada Skarn project and analyst upgrades, including Scotiabank's raised price target. Sentiment has improved due to operational execution and upcoming Q1 2026 results on May 5, though higher beta reflects sensitivity to metals prices and mining costs.
WPM Overview and Recent Performance
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) is a premier streaming company, providing upfront capital to miners in exchange for future production at fixed low costs, minimizing operational risks. It posted record Q4 and full-year 2025 revenue and earnings, bolstered by gold and silver output. Recent weeks have seen steady gains, supported by new royalty deals such as Spanish Mountain Gold, enhancing its portfolio. Shares have outperformed peers YTD, with lower volatility (beta 1.17) and positive analyst sentiment, ahead of Q1 2026 earnings on May 7. Elevated metals prices continue to drive favorable margins.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. These bots feature impressive stats, including annualized returns ranging from +32% to +127%, win rates of 50-70%, profit factors up to 3.33, and Sharpe ratios reflecting strong risk-adjusted performance. Examples include AI agents targeting semiconductors with +83-97% returns, data centers at +51-87%, and even energy/precious metals portfolios at +76%. Trending status highlights bots best suited to current market conditions like AI infrastructure booms and metals rallies. Traders can explore these for automated insights matching their risk tolerance and visit the page to copy top performers.
Head-to-Head Comparison
PAAS and WPM differ fundamentally: PAAS as a miner faces production costs, capex, and jurisdictional risks, while WPM's streaming yields high margins (often 50%+) with no operational overhead. Growth drivers include PAAS's mine expansions like La Colorada versus WPM's deal pipeline. Recent momentum favors WPM with better YTD gains and lower drawdowns. Risk profiles contrast: PAAS higher beta exposes it to metals volatility, while WPM offers stability. Both share silver sector exposure but WPM has broader gold diversification. Market sentiment is bullish for both amid silver's rally, though WPM trades at a premium valuation (higher PE ratio).
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward WPM due to its superior recent momentum, lower volatility, record cash flows, and expanding royalty stream providing consistent catalysts in a high-metals environment. While PAAS offers value via lower multiples and dividends, WPM's relative stability positions it better for near-term outperformance, subject to earnings outcomes and metals trends.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAAS is a Hold and WPM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PAAS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWPM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WPM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PAAS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WPM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PAAS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WPM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PAAS (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.04% price change this week, while WPM (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -11.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.71%.
Reported Earning Dates
PAAS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
WPM is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-11.03% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| PAAS | WPM | PAAS / WPM | |
| Capitalization | 20.6B | 55.3B | 37% |
| EBITDA | 2.22B | 2.4B | 92% |
| Gain YTD | -5.040 | 3.893 | -129% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.43 | 30.76 | 50% |
| Revenue | 4B | 2.75B | 146% |
| Total Cash | 1.61B | 2.17B | 75% |
| Total Debt | 845M | 7.66M | 11,028% |
PAAS | WPM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAAS's Valuation (18) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (41). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.
WPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (58). This means that WPM’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
WPM's SMR Rating (43) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (45). This means that WPM’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
WPM's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (50). This means that WPM’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
WPM's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (93). This means that WPM’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
| PAAS | WPM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 80% | 8 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
WPM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WPM has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WPM jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.