Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBAX
PABAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBAX
PABAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. PABAX (3.19B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: PABAX (2.14) vs RLBAX (1.13). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PABAX (33 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than PABAX (0.90). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PABAX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.72 vs. PABAX (10.46). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.85 vs. PABAX (10.02).
| PABAX | RLBAX | PABAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.32 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.32 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.628 | 9.555 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.19B | 283B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.14 | 1.13 | 189% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.46 | 11.72 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.09 | 41.70 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.02 | 29.85 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.77 | 73.93 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement