Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBAX
PABAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBAX
PABAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. PABAX (3.13B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: PABAX (2.14) vs RLBAX (1.13). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PABAX (33 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than PABAX (0.90). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PABAX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.43 vs. PABAX (9.39). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.18 vs. PABAX (8.02).
| PABAX | RLBAX | PABAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.32 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.32 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.305 | 7.908 | 80% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.13B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.14 | 1.13 | 189% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.39 | 10.43 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.07 | 35.45 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.02 | 28.18 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.43 | 73.40 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers