Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBAX
PABAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBAX
PABAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. PABAX (3.17B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: PABAX (2.59) vs RLBAX (1.11). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than PABAX (0.90). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PABAX (0) vs RLBAX (250). PABAX (11.28) and RLBAX (11.17) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.90 vs. PABAX (9.81).
| PABAX | RLBAX | PABAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.32 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.32 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.413 | 8.124 | 91% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.17B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 1.11 | 233% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.28 | 11.17 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.14 | 36.52 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.81 | 28.90 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.12 | 72.56 | 73% |