Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBCX
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$16.80
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.95
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. PABAX (2.25B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PABAX (2.13) vs RLBCX (1.57). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PABAX (31 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PABAX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.89 vs. PABAX (4.31). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.80 vs. PABAX (21.55).
| PABAX | RLBCX | PABAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.914 | 8.830 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 254B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 1.57 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.31 | 9.89 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.87 | 33.65 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.55 | 37.80 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.17 | 62.13 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement