Ad is loading...
PABAX vs RLBCX
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$15.68
Change-$0.26 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$33.88
Change-$0.55 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.28B
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 237B vs. PABAX (2.11B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PABAX (2.19) vs RLBCX (1.65). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PABAX (31 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (171.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PABAX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.82 vs. PABAX (0.96). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.76 vs. PABAX (18.76).
| PABAX | RLBCX | PABAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.504 | 0.938 | 54% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 237B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.19 | 1.65 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.96 | 4.82 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.35 | 16.52 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.76 | 32.76 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.73 | 50.74 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...