Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBCX
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$17.17
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.73
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a StrongBuy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. PABAX (2.29B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PABAX (2.92) vs RLBCX (1.53). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PABAX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. PABAX (3.74). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. PABAX (20.39).
| PABAX | RLBCX | PABAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.291 | 11.127 | 92% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 259B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.92 | 1.53 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.74 | 9.58 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.92 | 38.72 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.39 | 37.90 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.26 | 72.02 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement