Ad is loading...
PABAX vs RLBCX
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$15.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$34.14
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.05B
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. PABAX (2.11B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PABAX (2.71) vs RLBCX (1.70). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PABAX (31 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PABAX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.39 vs. PABAX (-0.14). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.93 vs. PABAX (21.52).
| PABAX | RLBCX | PABAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.183 | 0.323 | 57% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 234B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 1.70 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.14 | 4.39 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.86 | 20.95 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.52 | 34.93 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.82 | 48.02 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...