Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBCX
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$17.40
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.33B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$39.01
Change+$0.26 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. PABAX (2.33B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PABAX (2.46) vs RLBCX (1.49). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PABAX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. PABAX (2.05). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 42.54 vs. PABAX (21.96).
| PABAX | RLBCX | PABAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.961 | 15.132 | 79% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.33B | 266B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 1.49 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | 9.01 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.99 | 49.66 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.96 | 42.54 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.63 | 70.28 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement