Ad is loading...
PABAX vs RLBCX
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$15.04
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$32.75
Change-$0.08 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.9B
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. PABAX (2.01B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PABAX (2.72) vs RLBCX (1.69). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PABAX (31 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (171.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PABAX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.26 vs. PABAX (-1.92). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.02 vs. PABAX (17.79).
| PABAX | RLBCX | PABAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.272 | -3.762 | 114% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 225B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.72 | 1.69 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.92 | 2.26 | -85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.26 | 9.17 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.79 | 30.02 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.97 | 41.94 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...