Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBCX
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$16.99
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.19
Change-$0.09 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a StrongBuy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. PABAX (2.27B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PABAX (2.98) vs RLBCX (1.56). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PABAX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.61 vs. PABAX (3.26). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.26 vs. PABAX (19.89).
| PABAX | RLBCX | PABAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.263 | 9.537 | 97% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 256B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.98 | 1.56 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.26 | 7.61 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.75 | 28.47 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.89 | 36.26 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.65 | 63.18 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement