Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBCX
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$16.30
Change-$0.15 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.18B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$35.41
Change-$0.31 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. PABAX (2.18B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PABAX (2.62) vs RLBCX (1.63). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PABAX (31 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PABAX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.94 vs. PABAX (1.06). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.51 vs. PABAX (22.81).
| PABAX | RLBCX | PABAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.702 | 4.294 | 110% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 244B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.62 | 1.63 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.06 | 4.94 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.25 | 31.54 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.81 | 36.51 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.71 | 54.99 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement