Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBCX
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$16.83
Change+$0.06 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.64
Change+$0.18 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. PABAX (2.24B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PABAX (2.13) vs RLBCX (1.57). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PABAX (31 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PABAX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.52 vs. PABAX (2.50). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.59 vs. PABAX (23.03).
| PABAX | RLBCX | PABAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.121 | 7.917 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.24B | 252B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 1.57 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.50 | 7.52 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.09 | 34.01 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.03 | 39.59 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.91 | 62.14 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement