Ad is loading...
PABAX vs RLBCX
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$16.10
Change+$0.10 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.14B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$34.77
Change+$0.21 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.18B
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 240B vs. PABAX (2.14B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PABAX: RLBCX (1.98) vs PABAX (1.62). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PABAX (31 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 302.00 vs. RLBCX (171.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PABAX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.92 vs. PABAX (8.42). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.12 vs. PABAX (13.39).
| PABAX | RLBCX | PABAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.513 | 1.935 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 240B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 1.98 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.42 | 11.92 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.02 | 11.58 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.39 | 28.12 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.38 | 53.41 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...