Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBCX
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBCX
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. PABAX (3.17B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PABAX (2.60) vs RLBCX (1.52). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). PABAX (0.90) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RLBCX (50.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PABAX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.13 vs. PABAX (14.49). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.15 vs. PABAX (11.55).
| PABAX | RLBCX | PABAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.89 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.89 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.472 | 9.820 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.17B | 279B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.60 | 1.52 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.49 | 17.13 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.38 | 44.46 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.55 | 33.15 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.05 | 82.57 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement