Ad is loading...
PABAX vs RLBFX
PABAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$15.04
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$33.02
Change-$0.08 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.9B
PABAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. PABAX (2.01B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PABAX (2.72) vs RLBFX (2.26). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PABAX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (171.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PABAX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.88 vs. PABAX (-1.92). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.40 vs. PABAX (17.79).
| PABAX | RLBFX | PABAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.30 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.30 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.272 | -3.617 | 118% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 225B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.72 | 2.26 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.92 | 2.88 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.26 | 10.75 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.79 | 33.40 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.97 | 47.01 | 36% |