Ad is loading...
PABAX vs RLBFX
PABAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$15.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$34.44
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.05B
PABAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. PABAX (2.11B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PABAX (2.71) vs RLBFX (2.26). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PABAX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PABAX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.06 vs. PABAX (-0.14). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.47 vs. PABAX (21.52).
| PABAX | RLBFX | PABAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.183 | 0.528 | 35% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 234B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 2.26 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.14 | 5.06 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.86 | 22.75 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.52 | 38.47 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.82 | 53.33 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers