Ad is loading...
PABAX vs RLBFX
PABAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$16.23
Change-$0.16 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.15B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$35.39
Change-$0.35 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.57B
PABAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 245B vs. PABAX (2.15B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PABAX: RLBFX (2.50) vs PABAX (1.62). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PABAX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 302.00 vs. RLBFX (171.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PABAX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.16 vs. PABAX (5.98). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.33 vs. PABAX (15.13).
| PABAX | RLBFX | PABAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.342 | 4.187 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.15B | 245B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 2.50 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 12.16 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.07 | 18.96 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.13 | 33.33 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.69 | 57.85 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...