Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBFX
PABAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$16.99
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.52
Change-$0.09 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
PABAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. PABAX (2.27B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PABAX (2.98) vs RLBFX (2.08). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PABAX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.29 vs. PABAX (3.26). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.76 vs. PABAX (19.89).
| PABAX | RLBFX | PABAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.263 | 9.922 | 93% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 256B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.98 | 2.08 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.26 | 8.29 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.75 | 30.56 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.89 | 39.76 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.65 | 69.21 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers