Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBFX
PABAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$17.40
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.33B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.35
Change+$0.27 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
PABAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. PABAX (2.33B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PABAX (2.46) vs RLBFX (2.00). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PABAX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.71 vs. PABAX (2.05). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.28 vs. PABAX (21.96).
| PABAX | RLBFX | PABAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.961 | 15.683 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.33B | 266B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 2.00 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | 9.71 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.99 | 52.23 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.96 | 46.28 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.63 | 76.87 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement