Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBFX
PABAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$16.29
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$35.83
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.73B
PABAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. PABAX (2.17B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PABAX (2.62) vs RLBFX (2.18). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PABAX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PABAX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.28 vs. PABAX (0.86). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.31 vs. PABAX (18.65).
| PABAX | RLBFX | PABAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.875 | 4.702 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 244B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.62 | 2.18 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.86 | 7.28 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.18 | 23.88 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.65 | 36.31 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.38 | 61.89 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement