Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBFX
PABAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBFX
PABAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. PABAX (3.17B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PABAX (2.60) vs RLBFX (2.02). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). PABAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PABAX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.89 vs. PABAX (14.49). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.67 vs. PABAX (11.55).
| PABAX | RLBFX | PABAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.30 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.30 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.472 | 10.111 | 74% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.17B | 279B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.60 | 2.02 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.49 | 17.89 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.38 | 47.21 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.55 | 36.67 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.05 | 90.23 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement