Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABCX vs RLBAX
PABCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PABCX vs RLBAX
PABCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABCX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABCX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. PABCX (1.06B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than PABCX: RLBAX (1.11) vs PABCX (1.02). PABCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PABCX (30 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). PABCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). PABCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PABCX: RLBAX (250) vs PABCX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.52 vs. PABCX (5.46). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.62 vs. PABCX (6.40).
| PABCX | RLBAX | PABCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.32 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.32 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.365 | 7.341 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.11 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.46 | 9.52 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.16 | 34.60 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.40 | 27.62 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.46 | 71.38 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement