Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACAX vs QBDAX
PACAX vs QBDAX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs QBDAX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.80
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets561.97M
Quantified Managed Income Advisor
Price$8.28
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets227.13M
PACAX vs QBDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. QBDAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a Buy and QBDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 562M vs. QBDAX (227M). PACAX (3.25) and QBDAX (3.18) have matching dividends . PACAX was incepted earlier than QBDAX: PACAX (31 years) vs QBDAX (9 years). QBDAX (2.26) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). QBDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 718.00 vs. PACAX (372.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QBDAX: PACAX (0) vs QBDAX (10000). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. QBDAX (3.64). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.91 vs. QBDAX (-2.85).
| PACAX | QBDAX | PACAX / QBDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.26 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.26 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.060 | 2.981 | 103% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 562M | 227M | 248% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.25 | 3.18 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.19 | 3.64 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.45 | 0.25 | 4,892% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.91 | -2.85 | -313% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement