Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACAX vs QBDAX
PACAX vs QBDAX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs QBDAX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets580.37M
Quantified Managed Income Advisor
Price$8.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.48M
PACAX vs QBDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. QBDAX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a Buy and QBDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 580M vs. QBDAX (88.5M). PACAX pays higher dividends than QBDAX: PACAX (3.40) vs QBDAX (3.13). PACAX was incepted earlier than QBDAX: PACAX (32 years) vs QBDAX (10 years). QBDAX (2.26) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). QBDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 718.00 vs. PACAX (372.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QBDAX: PACAX (0) vs QBDAX (10000). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.85 vs. QBDAX (2.18). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.22 vs. QBDAX (0.05).
| PACAX | QBDAX | PACAX / QBDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.26 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.26 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.155 | 5.590 | 164% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 580M | 88.5M | 655% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 3.13 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.85 | 2.18 | 268% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.62 | 4.83 | 510% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.22 | 0.05 | 23,100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement