Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACAX vs SCLAX
PACAX vs SCLAX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs SCLAX
PACAX vs SCLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. SCLAX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a Hold and SCLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 835M vs. SCLAX (419M). PACAX pays higher dividends than SCLAX: PACAX (2.71) vs SCLAX (0.87). PACAX was incepted earlier than SCLAX: PACAX (33 years) vs SCLAX (14 years). SCLAX (0.98) and PACAX (0.96) have similar cost to investors . SCLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 260.00 vs. PACAX (243.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCLAX: PACAX (0) vs SCLAX (100000). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.73 vs. SCLAX (2.58). SCLAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.40 vs. PACAX (7.37).
| PACAX | SCLAX | PACAX / SCLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.62 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.98 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.115 | 2.264 | 138% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 835M | 419M | 199% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 0.87 | 311% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.73 | 2.58 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.77 | 14.43 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.37 | 11.40 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.56 | 22.36 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement