Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACAX vs WHGHX
PACAX vs WHGHX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs WHGHX
PACAX vs WHGHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. WHGHX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a Hold and WHGHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 835M vs. WHGHX (115M). WHGHX pays higher dividends than PACAX: WHGHX (5.58) vs PACAX (2.71). PACAX was incepted earlier than WHGHX: PACAX (33 years) vs WHGHX (15 years). PACAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than WHGHX (0.36). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. WHGHX (66.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGHX: PACAX (0) vs WHGHX (100000). WHGHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.11 vs. PACAX (3.64). WHGHX return over 5 years is better than : 25.10 vs. PACAX (7.37).
| PACAX | WHGHX | PACAX / WHGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.27 | 356% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.36 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.115 | 4.058 | 77% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 835M | 115M | 726% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 5.58 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.64 | 6.11 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.00 | 33.60 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.37 | 25.10 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.37 | 77.70 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement