Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACAX vs WHGHX
PACAX vs WHGHX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs WHGHX
PACAX vs WHGHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. WHGHX commentary
Sep 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a StrongBuy and WHGHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 847M vs. WHGHX (117M). WHGHX pays higher dividends than PACAX: WHGHX (5.58) vs PACAX (2.71). PACAX was incepted earlier than WHGHX: PACAX (33 years) vs WHGHX (15 years). PACAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than WHGHX (0.36). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. WHGHX (66.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGHX: PACAX (0) vs WHGHX (100000). WHGHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.95 vs. PACAX (6.52). WHGHX return over 5 years is better than : 25.74 vs. PACAX (7.27).
| PACAX | WHGHX | PACAX / WHGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.27 | 356% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.36 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.018 | 5.175 | 78% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 847M | 117M | 724% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 5.58 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.52 | 8.95 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.66 | 32.99 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.27 | 25.74 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.37 | 80.19 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement