Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACLX vs RPBAX
PACLX vs RPBAX Comparison
Open Charts PACLX vs RPBAX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Adv
Price$36.88
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.13B
T. Rowe Price Balanced
Price$28.37
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.83B
PACLX vs RPBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACLX vs. RPBAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACLX is a Buy and RPBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACLX has more cash in the bank: 69.1B vs. RPBAX (4.83B). RPBAX pays higher dividends than PACLX: RPBAX (2.00) vs PACLX (1.78). PACLX was incepted earlier than RPBAX: PACLX (21 years) vs RPBAX (86 years). PACLX (1.00) is less costly to investors than RPBAX (0.65). PACLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RPBAX (39.20). PACLX (2500) and RPBAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.20 vs. PACLX (6.27). RPBAX return over 5 years is better than : 20.27 vs. PACLX (19.13).
| PACLX | RPBAX | PACLX / RPBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.60 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.65 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 86 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.255 | 8.978 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.1B | 4.83B | 1,429% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 2.00 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.27 | 9.20 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.95 | 23.84 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.13 | 20.27 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.65 | 41.65 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement