Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACLX vs RPBAX
PACLX vs RPBAX Comparison
Open Charts PACLX vs RPBAX
PACLX vs RPBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACLX vs. RPBAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACLX is a Hold and RPBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACLX has more cash in the bank: 69.8B vs. RPBAX (5.29B). RPBAX pays higher dividends than PACLX: RPBAX (2.05) vs PACLX (1.48). PACLX was incepted earlier than RPBAX: PACLX (21 years) vs RPBAX (87 years). PACLX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RPBAX (0.66). PACLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 124.70 vs. RPBAX (43.70). PACLX (2500) and RPBAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. PACLX (5.29). RPBAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.99 vs. PACLX (6.95).
| PACLX | RPBAX | PACLX / RPBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.61 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.66 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 87 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.504 | 6.485 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.8B | 5.29B | 1,320% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 2.05 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.29 | 11.97 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.46 | 32.66 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.95 | 12.99 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.74 | 68.25 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers