Advertisement
PACS vs THC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACS is a Hold and THC is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PACS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTHC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- PACS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- THC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PACS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while THC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PACS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- THC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PACS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а -4.04% price change this week, while THC (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +6.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
PACS is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.
THC is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hospital/Nursing Management (-0.56% weekly)Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.
| PACS | THC | PACS / THC | |
| Capitalization | 1.73B | 17.3B | 10% |
| EBITDA | 216M | 4.62B | 5% |
| Gain YTD | -14.798 | 55.415 | -27% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.45 | 12.33 | 150% |
| Revenue | 3.56B | 20.7B | 17% |
| Total Cash | 73.4M | 2.63B | 3% |
| Total Debt | 2.67B | 13.2B | 20% |
THC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| PACS | THC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 21 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 86% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TVC | 23.98 | 0.20 | +0.84% |
| Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1998 Series D due June 1 2028 | |||
| MTBA | 50.55 | 0.14 | +0.28% |
| Simplify MBS ETF | |||
| XHYT | 35.07 | 0.09 | +0.26% |
| BondBloxx US HY Telecm Md Tech Sctr ETF | |||
| GAST | 31.41 | N/A | N/A |
| Gabelli Automation ETF | |||
| DAX | 44.10 | -0.13 | -0.29% |
| Global X DAX Germany ETF | |||
PACS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PACS has been loosely correlated with ENSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PACS jumps, then ENSG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PACS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PACS | 100% | -0.53% | ||
| ENSG - PACS | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| ARDT - PACS | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.33% | ||
| HCA - PACS | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.23% | ||
| UHS - PACS | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.39% | ||
| THC - PACS | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.90% | ||
More | ||||