PAG
Price
$158.13
Change
+$3.14 (+2.03%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.86B
5 days until earnings call
RUSHA
Price
$52.23
Change
+$1.23 (+2.41%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.12B
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PAG vs RUSHA

Header iconPAG vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts PAG vs RUSHABanner chart's image
Penske Automotive Group
Price$158.13
Change+$3.14 (+2.03%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization10.86B
Rush Enterprises
Price$52.23
Change+$1.23 (+2.41%)
Volume$8K
Capitalization4.12B
PAG vs RUSHA Comparison Chart
Loading...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAG vs. RUSHA commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAG is a Buy and RUSHA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (PAG: $154.99 vs. RUSHA: $51.00)
Brand notoriety: PAG and RUSHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAG: 87% vs. RUSHA: 69%
Market capitalization -- PAG: $10.86B vs. RUSHA: $4.12B
PAG [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $10.86B. RUSHA’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $4.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PAG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the long-term than RUSHA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the short-term than PAG.

Price Growth

PAG (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +3.54% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Specialty Stores) price change was -0.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+2.68% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($10.9B) has a higher market cap than RUSHA($4.12B). RUSHA has higher P/E ratio than PAG: RUSHA (12.75) vs PAG (10.37). PAG YTD gains are higher at: 4.505 vs. RUSHA (-4.322). PAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.79B vs. RUSHA (737M). RUSHA has more cash in the bank: 184M vs. PAG (96.4M). RUSHA has less debt than PAG: RUSHA (1.81B) vs PAG (7.74B). PAG has higher revenues than RUSHA: PAG (29.5B) vs RUSHA (7.93B).
PAGRUSHAPAG / RUSHA
Capitalization10.9B4.12B265%
EBITDA1.79B737M242%
Gain YTD4.505-4.322-104%
P/E Ratio10.3712.7581%
Revenue29.5B7.93B372%
Total Cash96.4M184M52%
Total Debt7.74B1.81B428%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAG vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
PAG
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1161
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49
SMR RATING
1..100
4855
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4957
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2826
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAG's Valuation (28) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (28) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (9) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's SMR Rating (48) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (55) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as PAG (28) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAGRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XTN70.601.87
+2.72%
SPDR® S&P Transportation ETF
CLM6.980.15
+2.20%
Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund
EEMA73.290.92
+1.27%
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
NDIA29.320.24
+0.82%
Global X India Active ETF
FLYD16.61-1.36
-7.54%
MicroSectors™ Travel -3X Inv Lvgd ETNs

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
+2.02%
GPI - PAG
85%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
ABG - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
SAH - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
AN - PAG
79%
Closely correlated
+2.64%
LAD - PAG
71%
Closely correlated
+4.99%
More

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
+2.47%
RUSHB - RUSHA
88%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
LAD - RUSHA
65%
Loosely correlated
+4.99%
ABG - RUSHA
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
AN - RUSHA
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.64%
PAG - RUSHA
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
More