PAG
Price
$162.67
Change
+$0.20 (+0.12%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
10.86B
47 days until earnings call
RUSHA
Price
$50.26
Change
+$0.04 (+0.08%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.12B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAG vs RUSHA

Header iconPAG vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts PAG vs RUSHABanner chart's image
Penske Automotive Group
Price$162.67
Change+$0.20 (+0.12%)
Volume$156.46K
Capitalization10.86B
Rush Enterprises
Price$50.26
Change+$0.04 (+0.08%)
Volume$410.57K
Capitalization4.12B
PAG vs RUSHA Comparison Chart
Loading...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAG vs. RUSHA commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAG is a Hold and RUSHA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (PAG: $162.67 vs. RUSHA: $50.27)
Brand notoriety: PAG and RUSHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAG: 62% vs. RUSHA: 77%
Market capitalization -- PAG: $10.86B vs. RUSHA: $4.12B
PAG [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $10.86B. RUSHA’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $4.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PAG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PAG and RUSHA are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the short-term than PAG.

Price Growth

PAG (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +0.22% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Specialty Stores) price change was +2.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.37% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($10.9B) has a higher market cap than RUSHA($4.12B). RUSHA has higher P/E ratio than PAG: RUSHA (12.75) vs PAG (10.37). PAG YTD gains are higher at: 8.355 vs. RUSHA (-7.621). PAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.79B vs. RUSHA (737M). RUSHA has more cash in the bank: 184M vs. PAG (96.4M). RUSHA has less debt than PAG: RUSHA (1.81B) vs PAG (7.74B). PAG has higher revenues than RUSHA: PAG (29.5B) vs RUSHA (7.93B).
PAGRUSHAPAG / RUSHA
Capitalization10.9B4.12B265%
EBITDA1.79B737M242%
Gain YTD8.355-7.621-110%
P/E Ratio10.3712.7581%
Revenue29.5B7.93B372%
Total Cash96.4M184M52%
Total Debt7.74B1.81B428%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAG vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
PAG
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
139
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
516
SMR RATING
1..100
4755
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4021
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
506

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUSHA's Valuation (26) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as PAG (31) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's SMR Rating (47) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (55) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (58) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as PAG (40) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAGRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLKR22.330.46
+2.09%
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
PUTD20.230.31
+1.53%
Cboe(R) Validus S&P 500(R) Dyn PtwIdxETF
SPLB22.02-0.06
-0.27%
SPDR® Portfolio Long Term Corp Bd ETF
IBTO24.13-0.07
-0.29%
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Trsy ETF
MGK348.42-2.86
-0.81%
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
+0.12%
GPI - PAG
85%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
ABG - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
SAH - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
+1.46%
AN - PAG
80%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
LAD - PAG
71%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
More

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
+0.10%
RUSHB - RUSHA
87%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
AN - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
LAD - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
ABG - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
PAG - RUSHA
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
More