PAG
Price
$171.04
Change
-$2.90 (-1.67%)
Updated
Oct 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.29B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
RUSHA
Price
$51.37
Change
-$0.60 (-1.15%)
Updated
Oct 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.08B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAG vs RUSHA

Header iconPAG vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts PAG vs RUSHABanner chart's image
Penske Automotive Group
Price$171.04
Change-$2.90 (-1.67%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization11.29B
Rush Enterprises
Price$51.37
Change-$0.60 (-1.15%)
Volume$469.95K
Capitalization4.08B
PAG vs RUSHA Comparison Chart in %
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAG vs. RUSHA commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAG is a Hold and RUSHA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (PAG: $171.01 vs. RUSHA: $51.38)
Brand notoriety: PAG and RUSHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAG: 119% vs. RUSHA: 125%
Market capitalization -- PAG: $11.29B vs. RUSHA: $4.08B
PAG [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $11.29B. RUSHA’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $49.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the long-term than RUSHA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the short-term than RUSHA.

Price Growth

PAG (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +1.56% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +1.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.80% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($11.3B) has a higher market cap than RUSHA($4.08B). RUSHA has higher P/E ratio than PAG: RUSHA (14.64) vs PAG (11.90). PAG YTD gains are higher at: 14.737 vs. RUSHA (-5.253). PAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.73B vs. RUSHA (682M). RUSHA has more cash in the bank: 211M vs. PAG (155M). RUSHA has less debt than PAG: RUSHA (1.75B) vs PAG (8.41B). PAG has higher revenues than RUSHA: PAG (30.6B) vs RUSHA (7.69B).
PAGRUSHAPAG / RUSHA
Capitalization11.3B4.08B277%
EBITDA1.73B682M254%
Gain YTD14.737-5.253-281%
P/E Ratio11.9014.6481%
Revenue30.6B7.69B398%
Total Cash155M211M73%
Total Debt8.41B1.75B480%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAG vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
PAG
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5852
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
624
SMR RATING
1..100
4957
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5760
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4240
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAG's Valuation (30) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (34) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (24) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's SMR Rating (49) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (60) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as PAG (42) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAGRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFEOX48.12N/A
N/A
DFA US Core Equity 1 I
TEBIX18.29N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual Beacon A
MNVAX28.72N/A
N/A
Madison Large Cap A
DASVX15.34N/A
N/A
Dunham Small Cap Value A
QRSIX44.08N/A
N/A
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Instl

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
-1.68%
GPI - PAG
85%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
SAH - PAG
83%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
ABG - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
AN - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
-1.97%
LAD - PAG
71%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
More