PAG
Price
$146.39
Change
+$2.41 (+1.67%)
Updated
Apr 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.86B
21 days until earnings call
SAH
Price
$57.86
Change
+$0.90 (+1.58%)
Updated
Apr 1 closing price
Capitalization
1.94B
22 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PAG vs SAH

Header iconPAG vs SAH Comparison
Open Charts PAG vs SAHBanner chart's image
Penske Automotive Group
Price$146.39
Change+$2.41 (+1.67%)
Volume$1.97K
Capitalization10.86B
Sonic Automotive
Price$57.86
Change+$0.90 (+1.58%)
Volume$236.41K
Capitalization1.94B
PAG vs SAH Comparison Chart
Loading...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAG vs. SAH commentary
Apr 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAG is a Hold and SAH is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 02, 2025
Stock price -- (PAG: $143.98 vs. SAH: $56.96)
Brand notoriety: PAG and SAH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAG: 184% vs. SAH: 206%
Market capitalization -- PAG: $10.86B vs. SAH: $1.94B
PAG [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $10.86B. SAH’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $9.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SAH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the long-term than SAH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SAH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PAG and SAH are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PAG (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -6.69% price change this week, while SAH (@Specialty Stores) price change was -9.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -3.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAG is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

SAH is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-3.31% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($10.9B) has a higher market cap than SAH($1.94B). SAH has higher P/E ratio than PAG: SAH (11.30) vs PAG (10.37). PAG YTD gains are higher at: -4.840 vs. SAH (-9.556). PAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.79B vs. SAH (559M). PAG has more cash in the bank: 96.4M vs. SAH (28.9M). SAH has less debt than PAG: SAH (3.86B) vs PAG (7.74B). PAG has higher revenues than SAH: PAG (29.5B) vs SAH (14.4B).
PAGSAHPAG / SAH
Capitalization10.9B1.94B561%
EBITDA1.79B559M319%
Gain YTD-4.840-9.55651%
P/E Ratio10.3711.3092%
Revenue29.5B14.4B205%
Total Cash96.4M28.9M334%
Total Debt7.74B3.86B200%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAG vs SAH: Fundamental Ratings
PAG
SAH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6053
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
620
SMR RATING
1..100
4842
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7878
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4673
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAG's Valuation (24) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as SAH (24). This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to SAH’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as SAH (20). This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to SAH’s over the last 12 months.

SAH's SMR Rating (42) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as PAG (48). This means that SAH’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

SAH's Price Growth Rating (78) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as PAG (78). This means that SAH’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as SAH (73). This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to SAH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAGSAH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IAU58.960.83
+1.43%
iShares Gold Trust
HIBS25.290.33
+1.32%
Direxion Daily S&P 500® Hi Bt Br 3X ETF
BJUN40.500.18
+0.46%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - June
HYBL28.12-0.01
-0.04%
SPDR® Blackstone High Income ETF
PREF18.70-0.02
-0.13%
Principal Spectrum Pref Secs Actv ETF

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
+1.89%
GPI - PAG
85%
Closely correlated
+1.59%
ABG - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
SAH - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
+3.36%
AN - PAG
77%
Closely correlated
+1.79%
LAD - PAG
71%
Closely correlated
+1.26%
More