Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PALC vs RECS
PALC vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts PALC vs RECS
PALC vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PALC vs. RECS commentary
Oct 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PALC is a StrongBuy and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PALC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 13 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TMFX | 24.40 | 0.30 | +1.26% |
| Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) | |||
| XSPI | 50.06 | 0.31 | +0.63% |
| NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI) | |||
| FSCC | 34.00 | 0.18 | +0.53% |
| Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) | |||
| TCHP | 52.25 | 0.17 | +0.33% |
| T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) | |||
| NLSI | 58.97 | -0.12 | -0.20% |
| NEOS Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI) | |||
Interesting Articles
PALC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PALC has been loosely correlated with EMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PALC jumps, then EMR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PALC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PALC | 100% | +1.11% | ||
| EMR - PALC | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| GS - PALC | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| IVZ - PALC | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| SWK - PALC | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| MS - PALC | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.38% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| MS - RECS | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| EMR - RECS | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.74% | ||
More | ||||