Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PALC vs RECS
PALC vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts PALC vs RECS
PALC vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PALC vs. RECS commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PALC is a Buy and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 6.03B vs. PALC (217M). PALC has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: PALC (11.406) vs RECS (10.529). PALC was incepted earlier than RECS: PALC (6 years) vs RECS (7 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than PALC (0.60). PALC has a higher turnover RECS (32.00) vs RECS (32.00).
| PALC | RECS | PALC / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 11.406 | 10.529 | 108% |
| Net Assets | 217M | 6.03B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.15 | 400% |
| Turnover | 451.00 | 32.00 | 1,409% |
| Yield | 1.10 | 0.74 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PALC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 84% | 10 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
PALC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PALC has been loosely correlated with EMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PALC jumps, then EMR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PALC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PALC | 100% | +0.64% | ||
| EMR - PALC | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| GS - PALC | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.73% | ||
| ETN - PALC | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| AME - PALC | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| IVZ - PALC | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.10% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
More | ||||