PAMT vs RRTS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMT is a Buy and RRTS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PAMT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRRTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PAMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RRTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PAMT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- PAMT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PAMT (@Trucking) experienced а -2.47% price change this week, while RRTS (@Trucking) price change was -5.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucking industry was -5.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
PAMT is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
RRTS is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Trucking (-5.95% weekly)The trucking industry provides road transportation delivery and logistical services, including moving large quantities of raw materials, works in process, and finished goods —often from manufacturing plants to retail distribution centers. Trucks are also used in the construction industry, as they transport large amounts of rocks, concrete, and other building materials used in construction. Trucks in the U.S. are responsible for the majority of freight movement over land, and therefore play an important role in the manufacturing, transportation, and warehousing industries. The business could be affected by economic cycles, since it is closely linked with manufacturing, retail and construction. Some of the major trucking companies in the U.S. are Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., and XPO Logistics, Inc.
| PAMT | RRTS | PAMT / RRTS | |
| Capitalization | 301M | 134M | 225% |
| EBITDA | 71M | -264.43M | -27% |
| Gain YTD | -15.568 | 16.333 | -95% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 715M | 1.85B | 39% |
| Total Cash | 111M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 326M | 404M | 81% |
PAMT | RRTS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 5 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAMT's Valuation (50) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as RRTS (50) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry. This means that PAMT’s stock grew similarly to RRTS’s over the last 12 months.
RRTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is in the same range as PAMT (100) in the Trucking industry. This means that RRTS’s stock grew similarly to PAMT’s over the last 12 months.
PAMT's SMR Rating (91) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as RRTS (100) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry. This means that PAMT’s stock grew similarly to RRTS’s over the last 12 months.
RRTS's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is in the same range as PAMT (57) in the Trucking industry. This means that RRTS’s stock grew similarly to PAMT’s over the last 12 months.
PAMT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Trucking industry is significantly better than the same rating for RRTS (100) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry. This means that PAMT’s stock grew significantly faster than RRTS’s over the last 12 months.
| PAMT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% |
PAMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAMT has been loosely correlated with MRTN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAMT jumps, then MRTN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAMT | 100% | -1.85% | ||
| MRTN - PAMT | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.00% | ||
| WERN - PAMT | 48% Loosely correlated | -4.47% | ||
| CVLG - PAMT | 44% Loosely correlated | -4.72% | ||
| HTLD - PAMT | 40% Loosely correlated | -3.66% | ||
| ARCB - PAMT | 38% Loosely correlated | -9.66% | ||
More | ||||
RRTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RRTS and HTLD have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RRTS and HTLD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RRTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRTS | 100% | -7.92% | ||
| HTLD - RRTS | 3% Poorly correlated | -3.66% | ||
| PAMT - RRTS | 0% Poorly correlated | -1.85% | ||
| MRTN - RRTS | 0% Poorly correlated | -3.00% | ||
| WERN - RRTS | -1% Poorly correlated | -4.47% | ||
| SAIA - RRTS | -1% Poorly correlated | -30.66% | ||
More | ||||