Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PARWX vs RMEBX
PARWX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PARWX vs RMEBX
PARWX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PARWX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PARWX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. PARWX (5.27B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PARWX: RMEBX (0.99) vs PARWX (0.58). PARWX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PARWX (21 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than PARWX (0.97). PARWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.25 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PARWX: RMEBX (250) vs PARWX (2000). PARWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.14 vs. RMEBX (4.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. PARWX (14.26).
| PARWX | RMEBX | PARWX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.07 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.07 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.918 | 8.448 | 200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.27B | 117B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.99 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.14 | 4.65 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.58 | 34.88 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.26 | 34.68 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.54 | 92.45 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement