Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PARWX vs RMEBX
PARWX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PARWX vs RMEBX
PARWX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PARWX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PARWX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. PARWX (5.3B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PARWX: RMEBX (1.00) vs PARWX (0.59). PARWX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PARWX (21 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than PARWX (0.97). PARWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.25 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PARWX: RMEBX (250) vs PARWX (2000). PARWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.64 vs. RMEBX (8.73). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.28 vs. PARWX (10.79).
| PARWX | RMEBX | PARWX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.07 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.07 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.858 | 9.059 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.3B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 1.00 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.64 | 8.73 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.12 | 34.30 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.79 | 36.28 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.29 | 89.36 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement