Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PARWX vs RMFCX
PARWX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PARWX vs RMFCX
PARWX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PARWX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PARWX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. PARWX (5.4B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PARWX: RMFCX (1.15) vs PARWX (0.59). PARWX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PARWX (21 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). PARWX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PARWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.25 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PARWX: RMFCX (250) vs PARWX (2000). PARWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.79 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. PARWX (13.89).
| PARWX | RMFCX | PARWX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.91 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.91 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.824 | 10.454 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.4B | 118B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 1.15 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.79 | 9.14 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.02 | 38.82 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.89 | 36.70 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.08 | 92.27 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement