Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PARWX vs RMFEX
PARWX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts PARWX vs RMFEX
PARWX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PARWX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PARWX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. PARWX (5.4B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than PARWX: RMFEX (1.41) vs PARWX (0.59). PARWX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: PARWX (21 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). PARWX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). PARWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.25 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PARWX: RMFEX (250) vs PARWX (2000). PARWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.79 vs. RMFEX (9.52). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.89 vs. PARWX (13.89).
| PARWX | RMFEX | PARWX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.62 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.62 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.824 | 10.681 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.4B | 118B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 1.41 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.79 | 9.52 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.02 | 40.18 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.89 | 38.89 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.08 | 100.46 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement