PATK
Price
$114.02
Change
+$0.33 (+0.29%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.79B
56 days until earnings call
SN
Price
$120.29
Change
+$1.74 (+1.47%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
16.98B
70 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PATK vs SN

Header iconPATK vs SN Comparison
Open Charts PATK vs SNBanner chart's image
Patrick Industries
Price$114.02
Change+$0.33 (+0.29%)
Volume$223.98K
Capitalization3.79B
SharkNinja
Price$120.29
Change+$1.74 (+1.47%)
Volume$1.13M
Capitalization16.98B
PATK vs SN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PATK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PATK vs. SN commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PATK is a StrongBuy and SN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (PATK: $114.02 vs. SN: $120.29)
Brand notoriety: PATK and SN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Home Furnishings industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PATK: 70% vs. SN: 74%
Market capitalization -- PATK: $3.79B vs. SN: $16.98B
PATK [@Home Furnishings] is valued at $3.79B. SN’s [@Home Furnishings] market capitalization is $16.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Furnishings] industry ranges from $29.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Furnishings] industry is $3.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PATK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PATK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PATK is a better buy in the long-term than SN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PATK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PATK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SN is a better buy in the short-term than PATK.

Price Growth

PATK (@Home Furnishings) experienced а +2.93% price change this week, while SN (@Home Furnishings) price change was +0.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was +2.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

PATK is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

SN is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Furnishings (+2.79% weekly)

The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SN($17B) has a higher market cap than PATK($3.79B). SN has higher P/E ratio than PATK: SN (32.87) vs PATK (30.98). PATK YTD gains are higher at: 38.939 vs. SN (23.552). SN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 859M vs. PATK (412M). SN has less debt than PATK: SN (919M) vs PATK (1.63B). SN has higher revenues than PATK: SN (5.88B) vs PATK (3.82B).
PATKSNPATK / SN
Capitalization3.79B17B22%
EBITDA412M859M48%
Gain YTD38.93923.552165%
P/E Ratio30.9832.8794%
Revenue3.82B5.88B65%
Total CashN/A188M-
Total Debt1.63B919M178%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PATK vs SN: Fundamental Ratings
PATK
SN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
687
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4718
SMR RATING
1..100
6735
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1289
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PATK's Valuation (32) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SN (91) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that PATK’s stock grew somewhat faster than SN’s over the last 12 months.

SN's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PATK (47) in the Building Products industry. This means that SN’s stock grew similarly to PATK’s over the last 12 months.

SN's SMR Rating (35) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PATK (67) in the Building Products industry. This means that SN’s stock grew similarly to PATK’s over the last 12 months.

PATK's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as SN (48) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that PATK’s stock grew similarly to SN’s over the last 12 months.

PATK's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for SN (89) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that PATK’s stock grew significantly faster than SN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PATKSN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PATK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VFMV131.150.54
+0.41%
Vanguard US Minimum Volatility ETF
USD89.720.18
+0.20%
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
EAOM29.06N/A
N/A
iShares ESG Aware 40/60 Mod Allc ETF
XHYT34.93N/A
N/A
BondBloxx US HY Telecm Md Tech Sctr ETF
PLTW43.57-1.28
-2.85%
Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF

PATK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PATK has been loosely correlated with MHK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PATK jumps, then MHK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PATK
1D Price
Change %
PATK100%
+0.29%
MHK - PATK
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
ETD - PATK
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
AMWD - PATK
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
MBC - PATK
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
LZB - PATK
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.82%
More

SN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SN has been loosely correlated with ETD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SN jumps, then ETD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SN
1D Price
Change %
SN100%
+1.47%
ETD - SN
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
SGI - SN
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
PATK - SN
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
LZB - SN
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.82%
MHK - SN
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
More