Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAULX vs RWMFX
PAULX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts PAULX vs RWMFX
PAULX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAULX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAULX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. PAULX (18.2B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than PAULX: RWMFX (1.41) vs PAULX (0.11). PAULX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: PAULX (17 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). PAULX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). PAULX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.40 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAULX: RWMFX (250) vs PAULX (2500). PAULX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.58 vs. RWMFX (2.09). PAULX return over 5 years is better than : 32.85 vs. RWMFX (27.39).
| PAULX | RWMFX | PAULX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.31 | 316% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.31 | 316% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.281 | 4.508 | 250% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.2B | 218B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 1.41 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.58 | 2.09 | 267% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.99 | 30.24 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.85 | 27.39 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.05 | 82.36 | 181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement