Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAVLX vs RMFCX
PAVLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PAVLX vs RMFCX
PAVLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAVLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAVLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. PAVLX (35.7B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PAVLX: RMFCX (1.15) vs PAVLX (0.50). PAVLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PAVLX (26 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). PAVLX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PAVLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.50 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAVLX: RMFCX (250) vs PAVLX (2500). PAVLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.45 vs. RMFCX (7.86). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.85 vs. PAVLX (17.22).
| PAVLX | RMFCX | PAVLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.936 | 10.283 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.7B | 118B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.15 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.45 | 7.86 | 260% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.05 | 36.34 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.22 | 35.85 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.36 | 93.12 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement