Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAWAX vs RGAAX
PAWAX vs RGAAX Comparison
Open Charts PAWAX vs RGAAX
PAWAX vs RGAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAWAX vs. RGAAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAWAX is a Buy and RGAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAAX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. PAWAX (13.5B). PAWAX (0.00) and RGAAX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAWAX was incepted earlier than RGAAX: PAWAX (21 years) vs RGAAX (24 years). RGAAX (1.37) is less costly to investors than PAWAX (1.05). PAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.80 vs. RGAAX (32.00). RGAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAWAX: RGAAX (250) vs PAWAX (2500). RGAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.14 vs. PAWAX (-5.26). RGAAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.72 vs. PAWAX (-3.21).
| PAWAX | RGAAX | PAWAX / RGAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.37 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.37 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.587 | 8.490 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.5B | 353B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.26 | -2.14 | 246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.26 | 35.28 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.21 | 4.72 | -68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.93 | 84.80 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement