Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAXGX vs RNPEX
PAXGX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts PAXGX vs RNPEX
PAXGX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAXGX vs. RNPEX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAXGX is a Buy and RNPEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. PAXGX (94.5M). RNPEX pays higher dividends than PAXGX: RNPEX (0.93) vs PAXGX (0.16). PAXGX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: PAXGX (8 years) vs RNPEX (24 years). PAXGX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.75). PAXGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RNPEX (23.00). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAXGX: RNPEX (250) vs PAXGX (1000). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.88 vs. PAXGX (-2.99). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 10.38 vs. PAXGX (3.00).
| PAXGX | RNPEX | PAXGX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.75 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.75 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.295 | 6.550 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.5M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.93 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.99 | 3.88 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.73 | 39.58 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.00 | 10.38 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 109.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement