PAYC
Price
$252.70
Change
+$3.35 (+1.34%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
11.26B
87 days until earnings call
QTWO
Price
$89.62
Change
-$1.17 (-1.29%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
3.1B
81 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PAYC vs QTWO

Header iconPAYC vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts PAYC vs QTWOBanner chart's image
Paycom Software
Price$252.70
Change+$3.35 (+1.34%)
Volume$730.43K
Capitalization11.26B
Q2 Holdings
Price$89.62
Change-$1.17 (-1.29%)
Volume$944.72K
Capitalization3.1B
PAYC vs QTWO Comparison Chart
Loading...
PAYC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAYC vs. QTWO commentary
May 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAYC is a StrongBuy and QTWO is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 10, 2025
Stock price -- (PAYC: $252.70 vs. QTWO: $89.62)
Brand notoriety: PAYC and QTWO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAYC: 107% vs. QTWO: 107%
Market capitalization -- PAYC: $11.26B vs. QTWO: $3.1B
PAYC [@Packaged Software] is valued at $11.26B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAYC’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PAYC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAYC is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAYC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAYC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAYC is a better buy in the short-term than QTWO.

Price Growth

PAYC (@Packaged Software) experienced а +11.14% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was +11.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAYC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.19% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAYC($11.3B) has a higher market cap than QTWO($3.11B). PAYC YTD gains are higher at: 23.504 vs. QTWO (-10.959). PAYC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 588M vs. QTWO (15.6M). QTWO has more cash in the bank: 324M vs. PAYC (294M). PAYC has higher revenues than QTWO: PAYC (1.69B) vs QTWO (625M).
PAYCQTWOPAYC / QTWO
Capitalization11.3B3.11B364%
EBITDA588M15.6M3,769%
Gain YTD23.504-10.959-214%
P/E Ratio33.72N/A-
Revenue1.69B625M271%
Total Cash294M324M91%
Total DebtN/A549M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAYC vs QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
PAYC
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2817
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9080
SMR RATING
1..100
2890
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
42n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAYC's Valuation (20) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (48) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PAYC’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as PAYC (90) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to PAYC’s over the last 12 months.

PAYC's SMR Rating (28) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PAYC’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

PAYC's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (41) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PAYC’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

PAYC's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PAYC’s stock grew significantly faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAYCQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PAYC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKTSX25.81N/A
N/A
iShares Total US Stock Market Idx K
TPYRX8.80N/A
N/A
Touchstone Sands Capital Intl Gr Eq R6
ELCIX42.08N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Growth I
HMVSX16.44N/A
N/A
Hartford MidCap Value R4
CFNCX80.44-0.13
-0.16%
American Funds Fundamental Invs 529C

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been loosely correlated with ALKT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then ALKT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
-1.29%
ALKT - QTWO
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
FRSH - QTWO
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
COIN - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.48%
ANSS - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
ADSK - QTWO
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
More