It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PAYC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTMVWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PAYC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
PAYC (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.88% price change this week, while TMVWF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.
PAYC is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
PAYC | TMVWF | PAYC / TMVWF | |
Capitalization | 11.3B | 3B | 377% |
EBITDA | 588M | 205M | 287% |
Gain YTD | 7.061 | -9.351 | -76% |
P/E Ratio | 33.72 | 31.85 | 106% |
Revenue | 1.69B | 583M | 291% |
Total Cash | 294M | 87.5M | 336% |
Total Debt | N/A | 633M | - |
PAYC | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAYC | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago64% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago66% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago72% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
ICOW | 29.79 | 0.10 | +0.34% |
Pacer Dev Mkts Intl Csh Cows 100 ETF | |||
APRH | 24.90 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
Innovator Premium Income 20 Bar ETF -Apr | |||
VO | 272.32 | -1.64 | -0.60% |
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | |||
VFMF | 135.60 | -0.97 | -0.71% |
Vanguard US Multifactor ETF | |||
SEPT | 30.49 | -0.23 | -0.76% |
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer10 Sep ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAYC has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAYC jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAYC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PAYC | 100% | -2.13% | ||
CLSK - PAYC | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
COIN - PAYC | 61% Loosely correlated | +9.69% | ||
RIOT - PAYC | 56% Loosely correlated | +4.26% | ||
PCTY - PAYC | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.75% | ||
LCHTF - PAYC | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMVWF has been loosely correlated with PAYC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMVWF jumps, then PAYC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMVWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TMVWF | 100% | N/A | ||
PAYC - TMVWF | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.13% | ||
LCHTF - TMVWF | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
CCRD - TMVWF | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
ZS - TMVWF | 33% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
ASAN - TMVWF | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.52% | ||
More |