Ad is loading...
PAYC
Price
$219.88
Change
-$4.79 (-2.13%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
85 days until earnings call
TMVWF
Price
$12.55
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
Ad is loading...

PAYC vs TMVWF

Header iconPAYC vs TMVWF Comparison
Open Charts PAYC vs TMVWFBanner chart's image
Paycom Software
Price$219.88
Change-$4.79 (-2.13%)
Volume$478.12K
CapitalizationN/A
TeamViewer SE
Price$12.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
PAYC vs TMVWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PAYC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAYC vs. TMVWF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAYC is a StrongSell and TMVWF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (PAYC: $219.88 vs. TMVWF: $12.55)
Brand notoriety: PAYC and TMVWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAYC: 71% vs. TMVWF: 6%
Market capitalization -- PAYC: $11.26B vs. TMVWF: $3B
PAYC [@Packaged Software] is valued at $11.26B. TMVWF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAYC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTMVWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PAYC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TMVWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAYC is a better buy in the long-term than TMVWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAYC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PAYC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

PAYC (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.88% price change this week, while TMVWF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAYC is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAYC($11.3B) has a higher market cap than TMVWF($3B). PAYC has higher P/E ratio than TMVWF: PAYC (33.72) vs TMVWF (31.85). PAYC YTD gains are higher at: 7.061 vs. TMVWF (-9.351). PAYC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 588M vs. TMVWF (205M). PAYC has more cash in the bank: 294M vs. TMVWF (87.5M). PAYC has higher revenues than TMVWF: PAYC (1.69B) vs TMVWF (583M).
PAYCTMVWFPAYC / TMVWF
Capitalization11.3B3B377%
EBITDA588M205M287%
Gain YTD7.061-9.351-76%
P/E Ratio33.7231.85106%
Revenue1.69B583M291%
Total Cash294M87.5M336%
Total DebtN/A633M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAYC: Fundamental Ratings
PAYC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92
SMR RATING
1..100
29
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAYC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PAYC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICOW29.790.10
+0.34%
Pacer Dev Mkts Intl Csh Cows 100 ETF
APRH24.90-0.01
-0.04%
Innovator Premium Income 20 Bar ETF -Apr
VO272.32-1.64
-0.60%
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
VFMF135.60-0.97
-0.71%
Vanguard US Multifactor ETF
SEPT30.49-0.23
-0.76%
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer10 Sep ETF

PAYC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAYC has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAYC jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAYC
1D Price
Change %
PAYC100%
-2.13%
CLSK - PAYC
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
COIN - PAYC
61%
Loosely correlated
+9.69%
RIOT - PAYC
56%
Loosely correlated
+4.26%
PCTY - PAYC
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.75%
LCHTF - PAYC
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

TMVWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMVWF has been loosely correlated with PAYC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMVWF jumps, then PAYC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMVWF
1D Price
Change %
TMVWF100%
N/A
PAYC - TMVWF
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
LCHTF - TMVWF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CCRD - TMVWF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
ZS - TMVWF
33%
Loosely correlated
-3.37%
ASAN - TMVWF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.52%
More